A Broker Should Not
Just Be A Person In The Middle
by Jay Mesinger
Often
people will ask me what I do for a living. My reply is that
I buy and sell aircraft. Usually they then want to know for
what company. When I tell them I sell all types of business
jets and work for myself, they say, "Oh, you’re a broker,
the guy in the middle, the middleman."
This is a
serious misconception of the role of the aircraft sales
professional that results from people in our industry
floating around the middle, working to attach to one side or
the other. Usually, the middleman type brokers are attached
by default to the paying side. I say default because they
may have started as a representative of one side but find
that they are being compensated by the other side.
Pretty
confusing. Yet, you’d be surprised by the number of times a
buyer will call to engage my services, and then tell me to
get my commission from the seller. In these cases I think
the most confused participants are the buyers. They are
setting themselves up for an unrepresented process.
You see,
the broker should not be the person in the middle. They
should be very clearly aligned emotionally, contractually
and financially to one side or the other. It only gets murky
when all three of these commitments are not properly
aligned. Since the roles are often murky, the reputation of
the institution of brokering can also be murky.
Believe me,
clearing up this murk is our job. As an institution we must
be the leaders in establishing clarity for our role in the
process of buying and selling. What follows are some
examples of this lack of clarity that create uneasy feelings
for aircraft buyers and sellers.
A client
whose aircraft I recently sold called to let me know that
several months after the sale he called the buyers and asked
them how they felt the process went. The feedback was very
interesting…
This
transaction was, like many, a process with a few twists.
After having this particular plane on the market for five
months, I received two offers on the same day. This often
makes for a difficult situation, setting up a horse race
that could cause the loss of both deals. Anyway, by the end
of the day, one of the buyers had clearly jumped out ahead.
I called the other buyer out of courtesy, to give them the
chance to meet the higher offer since they had given me the
first offer that day. They declined and I went back and took
the second and higher offer.
Three days
later, it became clear that the higher offer was made by
someone who was not really qualified to perform as quickly
as they had promised. My client and I had been talking
nonstop during the offer process and the days that followed.
We collaborated about every decision. When it was clear that
the second group was not going to perform, my client and I
decided to call the first group back and take their lower
offer if it was still available. I called, it was, and we
closed shortly thereafter.
When my
client called the buyer months later to ask the question
about their perspective of the transaction, the only comment
they had was how they felt his broker (me) had made up the
whole "other guy" story to get them to make a higher offer.
That was not at all the truth about the process that I
described.
They had a
perception about brokers not communicating with the client
but acting in a rogue way. They, of course, were not using a
broker and they felt even more justified in that decision to
not use a broker when they assumed that I had been playing
games.
Your broker
must work hard to establish lines of communication with your
entire team, including legal, financial and tax
professionals. In fact, more often than not, our company is
the glue for the team. We, as a group of sales
professionals, have to be careful to understand the
misconceptions of many. We cannot just be guys in the
middle. We must be viewed as team shapers.
Another
very difficult problem to overcome is the idea of the broker
making referrals to other services during a sales or
acquisition process. Our clients may wonder if we are
accepting finder’s fees or referral fees.
Many of you
reading this have been in the business for years and it is
only natural that you would have developed a huge bag of
wonderful service providers and vendors. We should be the
first person our client should ask for that referral. But
you would be surprised how often a new client will ask me,
after I start thinking out loud for a referral for one thing
or another, "Do you get a fee for that?" The answer of
course is no way! How could I possibly stay emotionally,
contractually and financially responsible to my client if
that were the case? I, like most of my other sales
professionals, are compensated one way, one time, upon
completion of the transaction.
I am sure
you each will have your own stories to relate about the
misconceptions that have been articulated about your role as
a broker. I’m also sure that having heard these
misconceptions you have in your own way made efforts to
clarify our position, not just for the person who mentioned
the misconception but also in your every action, so as to
create clarity for our entire industry.
To all of you who work daily to improve the
reputation of aircraft brokers, I want to thank you and
encourage you to keep up with this important work.
Jay Mesinger is the CEO of J. Mesinger Corporate Jet Sales, Inc. He is on the NBAA Board of Directors and is Vice Chairman of AMAC. Additionally, he is on the Duncan Aviation Customer Advisory Board.
|